MCA is a poppycock party with no balls, what’s your stand on hudud?

Monday, January 5th, 2009 2,155 views

MCA dares DAP on hudud

KUALA TERENGGANU: Tereng­ganu MCA has asked DAP to clearly state whether it opposes plans by its Pakatan Rakyat partner PAS to implement hudud laws should it ever come to power.

State MCA chairman Toh Chin Yaw said the presence of DAP deputy chairman Dr Tan Seng Giaw during the announcement of the PAS candidate for the Kuala Terengganu by-election at Stadium Negeri on Thurs- day reflected the former’s compromise over the implementation of the Islamic law.

Hello? MCA must be too dumb for not reading their own paper, because many times DAP already said it does not support hudud! How many times DAP needs to make its stand? Didn’t DAP left the informal coalition of PAS, KeADILan and DAP in 2002 soon after PAS proposed to have hudud in Terengganu? Do some research before making any stupid statements.

(more…)

Syed Hamid is an idiot?? No lah, he’s a moron.

Monday, September 15th, 2008 3,470 views

BN is beyond help. Idiots running amok.

Gutsy Sin Chew Daily senior journalist Tan Hoon Cheng makes Internal Security Act (ISA) history for being detained for the shortest period under the infamous detention-without-trial law – less than 20 hours! She was detained at 8.30 pm on Sept 12th and was release at 4.00 pm the next day (19.5 hours). The reason for her arrest?

According to Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar, Tan was detained for her safety as the police believed her life was “under threat”.

Quoting from Malaysiakini:

Speaking from Johor Baru this morning, Syed Hamid justified Tan’s detention under the ISA with a rare reason that it was as part of the government’s preventive measure ‘to ensure her safety’.

The minister claimed police intelligence have indicated that the journalist’s life came under threat after she reported an Umno division leader’s allegedly racist remarks.

“We have no intention of holding a reporter as after all she was just taking notes of the comments made by a certain party that led to a public debate.

“She maybe released as soon as today after police have obtained all information needed,” Syed Hamid was quoted as saying by Star Online.

(more…)

Saiful, you can go to hell!

Monday, July 28th, 2008 951 views

If what RPK wrote in his latest article ‘Doctor on the run: police want him to fabricate evidence against Anwar’ is true, then Saiful can be sure his place in hell is confirmed. As your religion says ‘fitnah’ (spreading mischief) is among the seven biggest sins that your God frowns upon and the reward is hell :arrow:

I quote from RPK’s article.

On 21 July 2008, I published an article in this same column called HOW, YET AGAIN, THEY ARE TRYING TO FABRICATE EVIDENCE AGAINST ANWAR. (Read the article here ).

In that article I mentioned as follows:

You see, they asked a certain doctor from a certain hospital to conduct an examination on Saiful. The doctor did so and he came out with a report that said there is no evidence Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised the young man. The police then picked up the doctor and detained him for three days. As much as they tried to force him to change his report to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.

Until today, the doctor stands by his report that there is no evidence Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is going to be made to pay for this but he doesn’t care. He is not going to change his report and say that Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, the police had to release Anwar on personal bond or police bail. The doctor refuses to doctor his report and neither does Anwar want to volunteer his new specimen.

Well, that doctor’s name is Dr Mohamed Osman Abdul Hamid from the Hospital Pusrawi and he has now taken his entire family and has gone into hiding because the police are looking for him and they want him to change his medical report.

At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan went to see Dr Mohamed Osman to complain about a pain he is suffering in his anus. Saiful told the doctor that he had been assaulted by ‘a very important person’ — meaning, of course, sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim.

Dr Mohamed Osman examined Saiful but found no evidence that he had been sodomised, either by Anwar Ibrahim or anyone else for that matter. The doctor’s report (which can be viewed below) says that there is zero (0) skin tearing, zero (0) active bleeding, zero (0) traces of pus, etc., which basically means he can’t be suffering from a pain in the anus as what he alleges.

The doctor’s diagnosis is that he rules out or TRO (to rule out) assault (sodomised). In short: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan is not suffering any pain in the anus and neither was he assaulted or sodomised in the anus.

Saiful then said he would like to make a police report so Dr Mohamed Osman suggested he go for a second medical examination at a government hospital. Saiful did so and the doctor at the government hospital also came out with the same diagnosis. Nevertheless, Saiful still made his police report at the pondok police in the hospital.

In spite of the doctors all confirming that Saiful was never sodomised, the police still pursued the case. Anwar Ibrahim was subsequently arrested by about 20 SWAT members in Balaclavas and armed to the teeth in a dramatic movie-style action-packed drama in front of his house after he had confirmed he would be reporting to the police station at 2.00pm as required.

The police detained Anwar in the lockup until the next morning and even brought him to the hospital for examination and to try to obtain his specimen for what the police say are for purposes of doing a DNA profile. The fact that the police already have Anwar’s DNA profile from 1998, plus the doctors from both hospitals confirm that Saiful was never sodomised, did not seem to matter.

Clearly the government is attempting to fabricate evidence against Anwar and is trying to indict him on trumped-up charges of sodomy. And who but the slime-ball AG and scumbag IGP, the same two players in the 1998 episode, can be behind this latest travesty of justice.

Read more at Malaysia-Today.

Included with the article is the doctor’s report:

Denial is necessary..

Wednesday, July 2nd, 2008 378 views

I love Pak Lah a lot. It is damn obvious right? If not, why I always talk about him, quoting him? :grin: He is my idol!! Numero Uno! I must put it to him, because I learn how not to say things like him.. for it may be used against me in the future.

“Ibarat meludah ke langit, terpercik ke muka sendiri.” (You spit into the air and the excretion drops on your face, messed.)

Lesson for today: Narcissism Denial is necessary.

Rosmah Mansor vs RPK:

Rosmah: I am innocent

KUALA LUMPUR: Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor said she was innocent of the allegation in a statutory declaration that she was present when the body of Mongolian translator Altantuya Shaariibuu was disposed of.

“If you are innocent, what is there for you to address? I am not a politician and I am not running for any post. I’m just the wife of a politician,” she said, when asked why she would not address such a serious allegation.

Najib vs Anwar Ibrahim:

Najib denies being involved with sodomy allegations against Anwar

KUALA LUMPUR, MON:

Datuk Seri Najib Razak denied that he had anything to do with the sodomy allegations against Parti Keadilan Rakyat de-facto leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

I am not involved at all in this case. I am not behind it. The most important thing is, did the act take place? That is for the police to investigate,” he said at a press conference at the parliament lobby today.

What Abdullah Ahmad Badawi said?

Abdullah vs The Accused:

“The police are the ones who will determine whether the report is true or not. It is not something that we can determine. He will definitely deny it. That is common for someone who has been accused.”

Thank you for such enlightening piece of crap. :up:

Wait.. but then Pak Lah also said something else.. He was fast to come to Najib’s and Rosmah’s rescue after RPK made the explosive statutory declaration recently.

“Raja Petra’s actions are unacceptable. It is not right,” Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi told reporters Tuesday. “I don’t believe that Najib and Rosmah are involved.

The investigation yet to be carried out on the statutory declaration, but Pak Lah already absolved his ‘friends’. That’s weird. He knows things that we don’t? He should have said he does not believe that Najib and Rosmah did it, but since an affidavit has been signed, a proper investigation must be carried out.

Here, the ‘accused’ need not to defend themselves / deny the accusation. Their ‘good friend’ did. Er, how is that fit with the line ‘He will definitely deny it. That is common for someone who has been accused.”?? Oh, I know..

“His/her friends will definitely deny it for him/her. That is common for friends of someone’s who has been accused” :up: (That’s what friends for right? Gotchu bek, moyte!! So I can stab your back.:arrow: )

Page 1 of 212»