MOOpiracy – Meet the Cowfathers… HishaMOOddin, MOOkhriz, MOOsa and MOOhyiddin

Friday, September 4th, 2009 1,440 views

I just came back from this place inside the dog’s mouth. Yes. Dog’s mouth. Not cow’s head. Look up Lahad Datu on Google Map. It was a work-related trip, kinda like a monthly affair for me now, except no blood involved. *gasp* Did I just make a sexist joke there?!

As for some comments in my Facebook saying I took planes like riding bikes, well from Miri to Lahad Datu, I need to transit at Kota Kinabalu. So it’s Miri-KK-Lahad Datu. I would spend time waiting at the airport more than the time I spend for work on the trip. (much less if you count the time I tweet lol) Typically, I need to wait for 4-5 hours at KK for the next flight to Lahad Datu.

Enough of my boring life. Let’s move on to my favourite topic, bashing idiots. It’s Friday so I will be gentle.

1st up for bashing today is.. HishamMOOddin Hussein, the Home Minister or famously known as his alter ego, Kerisman.

Hisham defends cow-head protestors

By Asrul Hadi Abdullah Sani

PUTRAJAYA, Sept 2 – The Home Minister today defended and justified last Friday’s cow-head demonstration after meeting with Malay-Muslim representatives of Shah Alam’s Section 23 at his office here today.

Datuk Seri Hishammuddin Hussein pointed out that the residents felt victimized and had no intention to stir racial emotion.

Why would we want to penalise anybody? HAHAHA!

“They are not getting off scot-free. They felt victimised and feel that there is another valid explanation on their part. There was no intention on their part to cause racial divide. They, the organisers, who are sitting left and right of me, didn’t even know that somebody was going to bring the head of the cow during that demonstration.” he said.

He added that the residents only wanted their voices to be heard but it was unfortunate that “the publicity they received was negative because it was linked with racial and religious sentiments.”

A group, claiming to be Muslim residents of Section 23 in Shah Alam, the new site of a Hindu temple, held a demonstration outside the Selangor state secretariat last Friday, dragging a severed cow-head, an animal sacred in Hinduism, which they stomped on and spat at under the gaze of the riot police.

The act was carried out by a group of 50 protestors who oppose the relocation of the Sri Mahamariamman Temple to Section 23 from Section 19, claiming the area is mainly occupied by Malay-Muslims.

The 150-year-old temple was built on a plantation which over the years was developed into housing estates by the Selangor Development Corporation (PKNS). No provisions were made to relocate the temple, which is now in the middle of a Muslim majority area.

Hishammuddin told reporters that the police allowed the demonstrators to proceed because the numbers of protestors were small.

“They said that they were very conscious and all that they wanted to do was to voice their unhappiness about the willingness of the state government to listen to their requests. I was told that even the Hindus there are not so passionate that it is built there (section 23),” he said.

Hishammuddin refuted claims that the protest was organised by Umno and said that the location allocated by the state government is not suitable because Section 23 is predominantly Malay.

However, a check last week showed the neighbourhood was multi-racial, with Indians making up more than a quarter of those who live there.

“If I wanted to use the issue to create chaos in Selangor, I can but we didn’t take such actions,” Hishammuddin said.

He tried to play down the cow-head incident by pointing out that there were previous incidents where a pig-head was used.

“I have it in my records to show there were cases where a pig-head was used by irresponsible parties including leaving the head in front of an Umno building covered by an Umno flag,” he said, but offered no details of such an act.

The Umno vice-president warned irresponsible parties not to provoke racial sentiments because it goes against the concept of 1 Malaysia.

Hishammuddin told reporters that the residents had met with Hindu Sangam two days ago and both parties will be releasing a media statement tomorrow.

“If it can be resolved quickly and can be done with both sides understanding each other … why would we want to penalise anybody?” he said, suggesting he was not in favour of legal action to be taken against any of the protestors.

This big nose clown must be really dumb and desperate to gain few votes from the ‘victimised’ residents.

1. No intention to stir racial emotion.

My blood is boiling over the stupidity displayed by our Home Minister, although from the experience with the previous Home Minister, we know idiocy is a prerequisite for anyone to hold the portfolio. Let’s listen to the ‘demands’ by the protesters and see whether they have intention or not to stir racial emotion.

“I challenge YB Khalid, YB Rodziah and Xavier Jeyakumar to go on with the temple construction. I guarantee bloodshed and racial tension will happen if this goes on, and the state will be held responsible,” shouted Ibrahim Haji Sabri amid strong chants of “Allahu Akbar!”

He then labelled Khalid a “traitor to the Malay race and Islam“.

Anyone with a thinking brain can relate to the innuendos and loud messages these menace were trying to send across when it involved temple, Hindu and cow. No intention to stir racial (and religious) sentiments my foot.

It is utter bollocks and irresponsible for these residents to cite ‘noise from the temple’ would disturb their own praying and religious activities. Is the Islam faith of the  Section 23, Shah Alam residents so weak that they are easily distracted? Well, judging from they did on last Friday, I don’t think anyone who profess and embrace the true spirit of Islam religion would want to be associated with these bunch of low lifes.

And, the last I checked, followers of other religions don’t get offended by the broadcast of prayer calls using loudspeaker 5 times a day starting from early dawn to late evening. At least, they never take it to the streets and carrying a chopped head of what other religion considers as a sacred animal.

2. “..didn’t even know that somebody was going to bring the head of the cow during that demonstration.”

This is bullshit. (pun on the bull not intended) Look at these photos.

Who was ‘carrying’ the cow’s head?

Look ma! They are carrying the cow’s head!

For sure it didn’t appear out of nowhere and joined the demonstration. Wait, actually I photochopped the cow’s head to the photos to make it appear like they did carry it. Poor them for being framed by me.

Same guy above carrying the cow’s head stomping it.

Even if it’s true they didn’t bring the cow’s head, why they spat and stomped on it?  And to think our dumb Home Minister believed the words by these liars. Wait, he’s too dumb to comprehend and went to say these residents  only wanted their voices to be heard and it was unfortunate  “the publicity they received was negative because it was linked with racial and religious sentiments.”

3. The police allowed the demonstrators to proceed because the numbers of protestors were small.

This is double standard and hypocrisy of the highest order! We sure remember how many times the police arrested candle vigils attendees although the number of them were small!

Apparently, gathering peacefully holding candles with no threats and killing of animals is more dangerous than a bunch of maniacs crying for bloodshed, spitting and stomping on the head of dead cow.

4. “…play down the cow-head incident by pointing out that there were previous incidents where a pig-head was used.”

Don’t clown us, Mr Clown-face Minister. Show us the prove if you have them. No way your publicity hungry, biased medias would not jump on such stories if they ever happened. Come on, show us what you have in your records.

Even if it’s true, you know doing that kind of action is WRONG. And to retaliate in the same manner is ALSO WRONG. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Shame on you for trying to downplay the cow-head incident and setting a dangerous precedent by seemingly suggesting the cow’s head protest is okay because they were previous incidents where a pig head was used.

5. The Umno vice-president warned irresponsible parties not to provoke racial sentiments because it goes against the concept of 1 Malaysia.

Oh funny. Now, those sitting next to you, what they did on that Friday afternoon again? Who is going against the concept of 1Malaysia if it’s not you by supporting and justifying the actions by the residents?  You are truly a piece of shit.

Phearrrr meh!!!

Seems like I waste too much internet space for HishaMOOddin and left little for the rest of the crooks. I’ll just write a short, simplified notes for the them

MOOhkriz Mahathir - Shame on you, stupidface for backing HishaMOOddin and the Section 23, Shah Alam cow-head protestors. You are just as racist as your father, but with half the brains. Maybe less. Just like your previous statement during Umno party election saying debate is not good for the party, I quote:

“Furthermore a public debate will only undermine efforts to strengthen the party especially if the issues brought up are sensationalised by the Opposition,” he said.

Now you are suggesting that ‘charging someone of their wrong doings can create unrest?’ That’s the dumbest thing coming our from your mouth, yet. I look forward for more stupid statements from you in the future. Or maybe you should take up this advice from a commenter in Malaysian Insider.

“An daddy-influence-conferred (otherwise disqualified) deputy with a morsel of wisdom would know when not to fart, much less through the mouth.”

MOOsa Hasan – Congratulations for getting your tenure as Inspector General of Police extended. May you continue to work for the demise betterment of Umno and BN and the crooks. Keep stalking those buggers in black shirts and candle vigils freaks. Crush them and rejoice!

MOOhyiddin Yassin – Just shut up, idiot. You are spoiling the very 1Malaysia your boss is trying not very hard to achieve. Oh, you are playing the bad guy and he’s playing the good guy? Very impressive performance. Keep up it but not for long for the wind of change is here and this time it’s ain’t your fart yo!

ps: Sorry for the absence, tweeting is so fun that I neglected my blog ;) As you can see from the Archive section at the side bar, for August I had only 6 posts  while in July I had 18.

pss: Follow my tweets, you”ll get daily, hourly, every minute and second updates of my craps. Simplified version of my blog. Apa tunggu lagi! bongkersz’s tweets, kami mesti pilih! I hope you get the joke.

psss: Emotionally exhausted. Have a great weekend folks!

Shahrir Samad, Malaysians are not idiots.. Stop lying!

Friday, November 21st, 2008 1,138 views

The government does not only consider the crude oil price but also other costs, such as for refinery and the processing, to determine the pump prices of fuel.

“It also has to calculate the margin for the industry of 19.54 sen per litre for petrol companies and 12.19 sen per litre for petrol stations, Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister Datuk Shahrir Abdul Samad said in the Dewan Rakyat today.

Shahrir, (No more calling him Datuk for me. If you notice I seldom refer any politician as Datuk, except Datuk Jessica Alba) it seems like you have completely gone over to the Dark Side. I used to respect you, as one of few UMNO members who has some intergrity and balls. Now you are spouting twisted, retarded bullshits for Malaysians to digest?

(more…)

Liar Liar!! Saiful Bukhari or Najib Tun Razak??

Saturday, July 19th, 2008 2,701 views

The whole thing just make no sense. Somebody is lying,  caught with his pant down! (pun intended). Please read the bold sentences carefully.

1. The following police report was made on 28 June 2008 at 5.45 PM by Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan, who turns 23 next week (IC No. 850706-01-5687):

“Saya Mohd Saiful Bukhari b Azlan ingin melaporkan bahawa saya telah diliwat oleh majikan saya. Perkara ini berlaku tanpa kerelaan saya. Kejadian terakhir berlaku 26/6/08 di Unit 1151, Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jln Setia Kasih, KL. Oleh itu, tujuan laporan ini dibuat untuk mendapat pembelaan dan keadilan keatas diri saya. Saya juga berasa bimbang dengan keselamatan diri dan keluarga saya jika perkara ini tersebar luas di khalayak ramai. Majikan saya Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim – Ketua Umum PKR.”

(Source: Rocky’s Bru)

2. Then our generous Deputy Prime Minister, Najib Tun Razak was quoted in the news:

KUALA LUMPUR: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan met with Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at the latter’s home to seek his view a few days before he lodged a police report against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

(Source: The Star Online)

Question:

How many days is considered ‘a few days’? 3 days? 4 days? Well it does not matter whether ‘a few days’ is 2 days, 3 days or 4 days. This is because, the alleged sodomy last happened on June 26th, 2008 according to the report made on June 28th, 2008 – 2 days after the ‘incident’. Then we have Najib said Saiful Bukhari came to meet him at his residence ‘a few days’ before he made the police report.

Now make your own assumption, WHEN EXACTLY Saiful Bukhari went to see Najib? Cannot be June 27th, because then Najib would say ‘yesterday’ instead of ‘a few days’. It must be June 26th or June 25th or days before that.

This is the interesting part, so this Saiful Bukhari…. HE WENT TO SEE NAJIB DAYS (June 26th, 25th, 24th, 23rd – pick your choice) BEFORE HE MADE THE POLICE REPORT ON JUNE 28th, AND THEN HE WAS SODOMISED ON THE 26th AGAIN?? Does that make any F sense to you?

Let me rephrase it again. According to Najib, Saiful Bukhari went to see him few days before he made the police report and after he met Najib, (his meeting with Najib must be happening either on June 26th or days before that) he was sodomised by Anwar on June 26th?? So, he let Anwar sodomised him again after he met Najib??

The explanations for all this crap only two:

1. The police report making its round in the internet is not the real police report lodged by Saiful Bukhari.

2. Najib Tun Razak was lying.

This brings us to another question, why under now there is no police report handed to the accused – Anwar Ibrahim? The latest news:

Deputy IGP clears the air, he states when Anwar will get report
By LOURDES CHARLES

KUALA LUMPUR: The police will give Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim a copy of the police report lodged by his former aide alleging that Anwar had sodomised him “if and when” Anwar is charged in court.

Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar said police could not give him a copy now as investigations were still in progress.

(Source: The Star Online)

Funny eh?? Then please do not forget to ask Najib again when the ‘case is complete’ because he said this:

Asked what Saiful had told him, Najib said: “A lot.

“The stories are many. Maybe I will reveal them later, but only after the case is completed.

(Source: The Star Online)

Lastly, do you think a hot headed person like Saiful Bukhari would let himself to be sodomised many times by a 61 years old man with bad back without fighting? Read this threat from him to this one guy in Friendster: “Killing Note from Saiful Bukhari” I quote:

Translation:

Subject:Hey Bastard

Don’t let me see you. I will ‘break’ your head. You better remove my sister’s photo. Bastard!

Ugh… I am so scared now… :shock: :shock: Are you?

Page 1 of 11