The Flaccid Mind

Liar Liar!! Saiful Bukhari or Najib Tun Razak??

The whole thing just make no sense. Somebody is lying,  caught with his pant down! (pun intended). Please read the bold sentences carefully.

1. The following police report was made on 28 June 2008 at 5.45 PM by Mohd Saiful Bukhari bin Azlan, who turns 23 next week (IC No. 850706-01-5687):

“Saya Mohd Saiful Bukhari b Azlan ingin melaporkan bahawa saya telah diliwat oleh majikan saya. Perkara ini berlaku tanpa kerelaan saya. Kejadian terakhir berlaku 26/6/08 di Unit 1151, Kondominium Desa Damansara, Jln Setia Kasih, KL. Oleh itu, tujuan laporan ini dibuat untuk mendapat pembelaan dan keadilan keatas diri saya. Saya juga berasa bimbang dengan keselamatan diri dan keluarga saya jika perkara ini tersebar luas di khalayak ramai. Majikan saya Dato Seri Anwar Ibrahim - Ketua Umum PKR.”

(Source: Rocky’s Bru)

2. Then our generous Deputy Prime Minister, Najib Tun Razak was quoted in the news:

KUALA LUMPUR: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Azlan met with Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at the latter’s home to seek his view a few days before he lodged a police report against Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim.

(Source: The Star Online)

Question:

How many days is considered ‘a few days’? 3 days? 4 days? Well it does not matter whether ‘a few days’ is 2 days, 3 days or 4 days. This is because, the alleged sodomy last happened on June 26th, 2008 according to the report made on June 28th, 2008 - 2 days after the ‘incident’. Then we have Najib said Saiful Bukhari came to meet him at his residence ‘a few days’ before he made the police report.

Now make your own assumption, WHEN EXACTLY Saiful Bukhari went to see Najib? Cannot be June 27th, because then Najib would say ‘yesterday’ instead of ‘a few days’. It must be June 26th or June 25th or days before that.

This is the interesting part, so this Saiful Bukhari…. HE WENT TO SEE NAJIB DAYS (June 26th, 25th, 24th, 23rd - pick your choice) BEFORE HE MADE THE POLICE REPORT ON JUNE 28th, AND THEN HE WAS SODOMISED ON THE 26th AGAIN?? Does that make any F sense to you?

Let me rephrase it again. According to Najib, Saiful Bukhari went to see him few days before he made the police report and after he met Najib, (his meeting with Najib must be happening either on June 26th or days before that) he was sodomised by Anwar on June 26th?? So, he let Anwar sodomised him again after he met Najib??

The explanations for all this crap only two:

1. The police report making its round in the internet is not the real police report lodged by Saiful Bukhari.

2. Najib Tun Razak was lying.

This brings us to another question, why under now there is no police report handed to the accused - Anwar Ibrahim? The latest news:

Deputy IGP clears the air, he states when Anwar will get report
By LOURDES CHARLES

KUALA LUMPUR: The police will give Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim a copy of the police report lodged by his former aide alleging that Anwar had sodomised him “if and when” Anwar is charged in court.

Deputy Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Ismail Omar said police could not give him a copy now as investigations were still in progress.

(Source: The Star Online)

Funny eh?? Then please do not forget to ask Najib again when the ‘case is complete’ because he said this:

Asked what Saiful had told him, Najib said: “A lot.

“The stories are many. Maybe I will reveal them later, but only after the case is completed.“

(Source: The Star Online)

Lastly, do you think a hot headed person like Saiful Bukhari would let himself to be sodomised many times by a 61 years old man with bad back without fighting? Read this threat from him to this one guy in Friendster: “Killing Note from Saiful Bukhari” I quote:

Translation:

Subject:Hey Bastard

Don’t let me see you. I will ‘break’ your head. You better remove my sister’s photo. Bastard!

Ugh… I am so scared now… Are you?

Popularity: 31% [?]

Posted in 2 cents, Anwar, BN-ism, Boleh-ism, Bolehland, Current Affairs, Mainstream Media, Malaysia, Najib Tun Razak | 36 Comments »

-_-||

“Dumb farkers, please stop forwarding stupid crap nonsense messages to me. You dumb fark!! I don’t farking care if friendster is going to be closed down or what. Even if it’s real your pathetic attempts at forwarding the message will not help. Pfft!!”

“But, sorry to retards..

retards = those who love to forward stupid messages such as friendster is closing down, send this farking message to x number of person so you will get laid the next day, this is so cute you must read it, send this pathetic story around for a good farking cause so some asshole will donate some money, spam the bulletin board.. You don’t have better things to do? Get a dog heh?

So, retards.. stay away! To the rest.. pretty sweet things.. you are much welcome. Come to me, give me some love.. muahahahaha! ”

I put that at my friendster profile. Yet, without fail everyday I still receive dumb chain messages which is pretty damn annoying. What is wrong you people? I can accept some corny butt jokes or some fetish porn stuffs but I really do not like stupid forwarded messages.

If you are cute, then you are cute no more in my eyes if you did that to me. It is a waste of time for me to click on your message and delete it, which I can use to play Warbook, writing a crappy blog post, reading my friends’ blogs, downloading movies..

Do you guys like forwarded messages? How you deal with it? Should I spam their inbox with their own messages? Erk.. that will make me one of them and it’s a waste of time, which I can use to play Warbook, writing a crappy blog post, reading my friends’ blogs, downloading movies..

I was chatting with a friend just now. I said I want to write something in my blog but I am clueless of what to write. She told me why don’t you write about yourself.. your hobbies, your dreams, your friends, your personality.. I replied her “I have none. I’m boring”. Then she told me to write about just that. “I have no dreams. I am boring.” Okay, that is it. The end of this pointless post. Thank you for your time.

Popularity: 2% [?]

Posted in Craps, Friends, Idiocracy | 24 Comments »