»

Najib vs Anwar Flip Flops Match


KUALA LUMPUR: Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak has reiterated that he had neither met nor known Altantuya Shaariibuu.

“The statutory declaration, which I consider a horrible lie, a mere fabrication with malicious intention and slanderous element is aimed at smearing my image,” he told a packed press conference held at about 7pm at his office in Parliament Building here yesterday.

Najib said the statutory declaration by private investigator P. Balasubramaniam was a “red herring” by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to divert public attention from the sodomy allegation against the PKR adviser.

“I am very sure that this is a very desperate attempt to divert attention from the sodomy allegation that Anwar is facing now.

“What is important now is not the matter raised as a diversion, (or as a) red herring. … What people want to know is whether the sodomy case happened or not. I hope the relevant authorities will investigate and make an announcement as soon as possible,” he said.

On the statutory declaration, Najib said as it contradicted the testimonies in court and also the police report, he would leave it to the authorities to investigate fully, but stressed that he also had rights as a citizen to defend himself.

I can take personal action, but what is more important is that action can be taken because there are provisions of the law like defamation and so forth,” he added.

Najib also denied that he had had a sexual relationship with Altantuya, nor did he conspire to cover up her murder as alleged by Balasubramaniam.

“No, absolutely not, because I have never ever met her,” he said

Asked whether he was willing to be investigated, he said: “Why should I be investigated? Give me a good reason. The police have investigated the entire Altantuya case, so they know everything.

The parties responsible (for the statutory declaration) should be prepared to accept any consequences if the authorities uncover any legal wrongdoing.”

Najib questioned why the matter had to come up now after Anwar was recently accused of sodomy.

“Now, suddenly everyone is under attack, the Inspector-General of Police, the Attorney-General, even I am attacked.

“Why now? This is the question,” he added.

“If he (Anwar) was so concerned about the case he should have brought it up much, much earlier. Why now?” he added.

Asked whether the latest accusations would affect him during the coming Umno elections, Najib said it would not.

“I’m very relaxed about it. As you can see I’m still smiling. I’m not worried at all because the truth will prevail,” he added.

Najib said he believed in the (justice) system and stressed that he had not done anything wrong.

“There’s nothing to be worried about. Life goes on as usual. As far as I’m concerned, it’s business as usual,” he added.

It is funny when he is in the soup, he cried ‘Wolf! Wolf!’ but when Anwar is in the soup, he cried ‘Police! Police!’.

To borrow the words from the horse’s mouth:

1. “The statutory declaration, which I consider a horrible lie, a mere fabrication with malicious intention and slanderous element is aimed at smearing my image,”

– Anwar may say “The sodomy allegation and the police report by Saiful Bukhari, which I consider a horrible lie, a mere fabrication with malicious intention and slanderous element is aimed at smearing my image”

2. Najib said the statutory declaration by private investigator P. Balasubramaniam was a “red herring” by Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim to divert public attention from the sodomy allegation against the PKR adviser.

“I am very sure that this is a very desperate attempt to divert attention from the sodomy allegation that Anwar is facing now.

– Hmm.. the sodomy allegation by Anwar’s ‘special aide’ Saiful Bukhari was a ‘red herring’ by ‘some people’ to divert public attention from the Statutory Declaration (SD) made by Raja Petra Kamarudin against the DPM’s wife. A desperate attempt to divert public attention from the SD.

3. “What is important now is not the matter raised as a diversion, (or as a) red herring. … What people want to know is whether the sodomy case happened or not.

– What is important now is not the matter raised as a diversion, (or as a) red herring… What people want to know it whether the SD by RPK has any truth or not. Hey, why he thinks the SD by RPK is not important? Or SD by Balasubramaniam is not important?

We also want to know whether Najib and his wife was involved in the murder of Altantuya. We also want to know the truth. We want things mentioned in the SD to be investigated, well to clear our beloved DPM’s name and charge the bloody person that made the false SD, send them to jail for making a false declaration and lie to public.

It is more important because Najib currently is our Deputy Prime Minister while Anwar Ibrahim is a nobody now. He is not in the government, he is not a minister, he is not a member of parliament, he is not even paid by the rakyat to serve them.

4. “I can take personal action, but what is more important is that action can be taken because there are provisions of the law like defamation and so forth,

This is very funny. IF you are damn sure it (the SD) is  a lie, malicious and slanderous fabrication, you should be fast to say you are going to sue without any hesitation. Say it.. “I will fucking sue P Balasubramaniam and Anwar Ibrahim for making false allegation and defaming me. I will bring this to court and sue them till they drop to their pants.” Or make a police report against them. I don’t know if a person make a SD, can you make a police report against that SD. Me no lawyer. What ever, but point is, he should say ‘Yes I will take personal action, not I can take personal action.. “ because it sounds wrong.. I can take.. WTF!

5. “Why should I be investigated? Give me a good reason. The police have investigated the entire Altantuya case, so they know everything.

The parties responsible (for the statutory declaration) should be prepared to accept any consequences if the authorities uncover any legal wrongdoing.”

:???: Why should you be investigated?? Oh crap. Because you are named in a Statutory Declaration, tolol! SD is a serious shit.

SD has been defined as “A statutory declaration is a legal document defined under the law of certain Commonwealth nations. It is similar to a statement made under oath, however, it is not sworn.

Statutory declarations are commonly used to allow a person to affirm something to be true for the purposes of satisfying some legal requirement or regulation when no other evidence is available. They are thus similar to affidavits (which are made on oath).”

Intentionally making a false statement as a statutory declaration is a crime equivalent to perjury, and punishable by fines and/or a prison sentence of up to 4 years. (Australia)

Sure the parties responsible for the statutory declaration should know better about the consequences they may face should the authorities uncover any legal wrongdoing. They wil go to jail for making a false declaration.

*******************************************************************

There are too many questions with no answer.

1. Lately, we see people making SD like nobody’s business, it sure gives us an image that SD is conveniently abused like a toilet paper, recklessly using it for their sordid political mileage.

2.  A lot of things mentioned in the SD still just ‘hearsay’ and from ‘reliable sources’. There are still a lot to prove. Hey I want to make a SD based on my ‘reliable sources’ too. Just RM4.00 can make one 😀

3. A certain politician is laughing and probably busy eating his popcorn with coke enjoying the mud-slinging show between his biggest rivals. He is having a big feast!

4. Conveniently, the run up of UMNO branch meetings begin in two weeks, the UMNO election is coming soon and Anwar has 2 more months to deliver his promise – 16 September 2008.

5. If you recall correctly, when another witness mentioned Najib’s name in court, the entire prosecution and defense team got their knickers in a knot, and the judge expunged the statement from the court record. The latest SD sure interesting.

6. Najib is not making any sense with his funny explanations on Saiful Bukhari, the sodomy ‘victim’.

First he said he met Saiful Bukhari 3 months ago about scholarship (Wait.. the guy met with DPM or his special assistant, Khairil Anas? Damn I am confused.) Now he said he met Saiful Bukhari few days before polis report and Saiful even TOLD HIM that he was sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim. .. Which one is true?

Najib said he then told Saiful that it was up to him if he wanted to lodge a police report against Anwar.

“I said to him ‘It’s up to you.’ I left it to him to decide whether he wanted to leave it to the police to investigate and carry out the next course of action

What?? Sodomy is a serious crime. He should have said “You should make a police report if this is true”. How funny of all people, this Saiful Bukhari went to see him. Of 26 million Malaysians!! How wonderful. Why not go to Michael Chong? :arrow: Why go to Najib??

Why this nobody, college dropout and an assistant to opposition leader, Saiful, end up in our DPM’s private residence over a weekend to express his emotional trauma from the alleged sodomy episode he had with Anwar Ibrahim? I didn’t know there was a open house at DPM’s over the weekend?! Oh… open house that only one person was invited.

Usah khuatir sekiranya anda mangsa liwat. Jumpa Datuk N.

7. It is your words against mine drama now. :roll: Who is telling the truth??? It is for you to decide.

Latest Update:

PI Balasubramaniam retracts parts of his Statutory Declaration. (updated)

PI retracts declaration

KUALA LUMPUR: Political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda’s private investigator P. Balasubramaniam on Friday retracted his statutory declaration which he made less than 24 hours ago.

“I wish to retract the entire contents of my statuutory declaration dated July 1 2008. I was compelled to affirm the said statutory declaration under duress,” said Balasubramaniam in his new statutory declaration dated Friday.

The new statutory declaration states:

“I wish to expressly state that at no material time did (Abdul) Razak (Abdullah) Baginda inform me that he was introduced to Altantuya Shaaribu by a VIP and at no material time did Razak Baginda inform me that Datuk Seri Najib (Tun Razak) had a sexual relationship with Altantuya Shaaribu and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.

“At no material time did Razak Baginda inform me that Datuk Seri Najib instructed Razak Baginda to look after Altantuya Shaaribu as he did not want her to harass him since he was the Deputy Prime Minister.”

Not only do we have flip flop leaders… we also have flip flop PIs… WTF!! Charge the bugger for treating SD like a toilet paper. Hell, we don’t even recycle our toilet paper. Under duress my foot!

Nat has this to say:

Threatened? Bribed? Lied?

The truth is, I have no idea.

But let’s be patient, I suspect more intriguing facts will reveal themselves shortly, and will try to update if I can.

In the meantime, here’s a question for you. Who is this M. Arulampalam, Bala’s new lawyer? Who is he connected to? Why get rid of the former lawyer?

Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

You probably want to check out these posts as well:

15 Responses to “Najib vs Anwar Flip Flops Match”

  1. gp wrote on Jul 4, 2008 at 1:15 pm

    in order to see pembela mangsa liwat, I must be liwat first.. where is the poster for meliwat services … 😀

    [Reply]

  2. foongpc wrote on Jul 4, 2008 at 1:16 pm

    OK, now they are saying one thing, and the next they are saying another and in the end, I don’t know what is true and what is not. But I would like to see how it all ends. More drama ahead?

    [Reply]

  3. catwoman wrote on Jul 4, 2008 at 1:24 pm

    :mrgreen: 😯 :vangry: 🙄 😡 😮 😥 :up: 👿

    [Reply]

  4. bongkersz wrote on Jul 4, 2008 at 3:17 pm

    quite sick of it, seriously. one keep on lying or making stupid statements. another one flip flops. another one keep saying he got evidence but i yet to see any.. other that what he said.

    [Reply]

  5. bongkersz wrote on Jul 4, 2008 at 3:18 pm

    leave it to you to create the poster 😀 😀 :up:

    [Reply]

  6. Aisyah wrote on Jul 4, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    tgk Hancock nye liwat lagi dahsyat. kepala masuk bontot. hahaha.

    *off topic. sorry*

    erm.. pasal issue ni.. er… the history repeats. the end.

    [Reply]

  7. bongkersz wrote on Jul 5, 2008 at 2:33 pm

    kepala masuk bontot? 😕 😯 😯 😯 itu bukan liwat lagi.. itu kekwat… hahahahahaaaa!

    [Reply]

  8. Idi Amin disciples: Badawi, Khairy, Najib, Rosmah wrote on Jul 5, 2008 at 4:55 pm

    Sex and the C4

    Sodomy is a useful word
    recently said and heard,
    in Malaysian homes and offices
    it’s all about famous orifices.
    What is going on, you wonder
    when Bala steals the thunder,
    finger pointing the magic word
    to the delight of a horny herd
    Organs united, names forgotten?
    VIPs are really rotten
    Saiful he knows and did not know
    doubts about Aminah begin to grow
    of whose loose lips he was afraid
    but liked her other end instead;
    of course he knew it wasn’t right
    but it felt so good and tight!
    You could not hump like Greeks
    the Hindenburg’s fat cheeks;
    what her hubby found so succulent
    was making Rosmah trucculent.
    And so she thought, the time was due
    for a nice Mongolian barbecue.
    Enter the analyst, not so anal,
    who found the girl too banal;
    fearing supernatural harm
    from her juicy feminine charm,
    he hired Bala straightaway
    to keep the honeytrap at bay
    but private dicks were of no match
    for Aminah’s superlative snatch
    and now that Najib had had his fill,
    he would not share the till;
    right after the submarine deal,
    Aminah’s fate he would seal.
    Now Rosmah had one idea
    on how to kenakan dia
    “Let’s bomb the bombshell,
    let’s send her to hell.”
    Thus perished the hapless beauty
    after translation and booty duty;
    now Rosmah’s ass was happy
    until one blogger got yappy;
    this Hindenburg nearly caught fire
    yet to sue she has no desire.
    But Najib’s part in this murder
    will travel much further;
    despite his media actions
    and one or two retractions,
    some questions will remain
    a big part of his bane–
    how did Altantuya really die?
    and why did he have to lie?
    Did he pay off Bala savvily,
    or threaten to C4 his family?
    What acts could be more despised?
    With his money, we’re not surprised;
    after all, he’s such a bully beast,
    to him and him alone, at least,
    magic words that cannot apply–
    are useful for making rivals die.

    [Reply]

  9. bongkersz wrote on Jul 6, 2008 at 10:46 pm

    dude, that’s one fine piece of work by you!! :up: :up: mind if i share it around? ➡

    [Reply]

  10. Idi Amin disciples: Badawi, Khairy, Najib, Rosmah wrote on Jul 7, 2008 at 10:08 am

    Thx bongkerz – datz kind of u 2 say so n i wish i cud take kredit 4it but i mus confess i cud nevr write smth like dat.
    😥 i got dis by emel forwarded n just copied and paste here cuz like u i thot its a :up: fine piece of work too. 😆

    [Reply]

  11. Clement Hii wrote on Jul 9, 2008 at 10:58 pm

    I disagree. I think this kind of content is very immoral and disrespectful towards our country. As long as there is a government in place, we should respect that government. Furthermore, I think bloggers’ works are very damaging to the country.

    [Reply]

  12. bongkersz wrote on Jul 10, 2008 at 8:44 am

    haha! respecting the government means, one shouldn’t criticize what he thinks is wrong? i wonder if the government shows guys like you much respect. if you didn’t notice, much of my contents are sourced from the local media, so they can write, i cannot comment?

    anyway, i’m entitled to my opinion no? it is okay to disagree, i would love to hear your reasons. hey, point me out which content is immoral and disrespectful towards our country, smart guy.. ➡

    oooohhh??? small fries like us.. are very DAMAGING to the country? how DAMAGING? while big sharks roaming around that actually doing more damages to the country are not? 😕 why bloggers’ works are damaging to the country when they are writing with facts and not lies? well, people like you can always try to prove us wrong.. with your ‘facts’. haha!

    [Reply]

  13. tukbugis wrote on Jul 10, 2008 at 10:24 pm

    aku rasa dia nih pasti orang bn manalah tau , cakap yg bukan2

    [Reply]

  14. bongkersz wrote on Jul 11, 2008 at 6:07 pm

    hahaha! orang yang cakap bukan2 ada di mana-mana bro 😆

    [Reply]

  15. zacky wrote on Jul 17, 2008 at 7:10 pm

    Dalam al-Quran, Allah berfirman, …dan ingatlah (angkara) fitnah itu lebih besar bahayanya daripada membunuh…(al-Baqarah: 191).

    Allah turut menjelaskan betapa buruknya perbuatan mengumpat dan fitnah itu menerusi firman-Nya: …dan janganlah kamu mengintip atau mencari-cari kesalahan dan keaiban orang dan janganlah sesetengah kamu mengumpat setengah yang lain. Adakah seseorang dari kamu suka makan daging saudaranya yang telah mati?…(al-Hujurat: 12)

    [Reply]

Drop a comment :)

Page 1 of 11