I’m a ENFP huh? Nah.. just another personality test.

Note: Skip reading if you are lazy. Super long crap. HA! HA!

Chian tagged me. This is another personality test, quite long winded especially the explanations. It’s Friday, why not?

Here is the test – Personality test based on Jung – Myers-Briggs typology

A psychometric questionnaire designed to measure psychological preferences in how people perceive the world and make decisions.

(Source: Wikipedia)


Your Type is ENFP

Extraverted – 44 %
Intuitive – 12 %
Feeling – 12 %
Perceiving – 44%

You are:

* moderately expressed extravert

* slightly expressed intuitive personality

* slightly expressed feeling personality

* moderately expressed perceiving personality


ENFP type description by D.Keirsey

Like the other Idealists, Champions are rather rare, say two or three percent of the population, but even more than the others they consider intense emotional experiences as being vital to a full life. Champions have a wide range and variety of emotions, and a great passion for novelty. They see life as an exciting drama, pregnant with possibilities for both good and evil, and they want to experience all the meaningful events and fascinating people in the world. The most outgoing of the Idealists, Champions often can’t wait to tell others of their extraordinary experiences. Champions can be tireless in talking with others, like fountains that bubble and splash, spilling over their own words to get it all out. And usually this is not simple storytelling; Champions often speak (or write) in the hope of revealing some truth about human experience, or of motivating others with their powerful convictions. Their strong drive to speak out on issues and events, along with their boundless enthusiasm and natural talent with language, makes them the most vivacious and inspiring of all the types.

Fiercely individualistic, Champions strive toward a kind of personal authenticity, and this intention always to be themselves is usually quite attractive to others. At the same time, Champions have outstanding intuitive powers and can tell what is going on inside of others, reading hidden emotions and giving special significance to words or actions. In fact, Champions are constantly scanning the social environment, and no intriguing character or silent motive is likely to escape their attention. Far more than the other Idealists, Champions are keen and probing observers of the people around them, and are capable of intense concentration on another individual. Their attention is rarely passive or casual. On the contrary, Champions tend to be extra sensitive and alert, always ready for emergencies, always on the lookout for what’s possible.

Champions are good with people and usually have a wide range of personal relationships. They are warm and full of energy with their friends. They are likable and at ease with colleagues, and handle their employees or students with great skill. They are good in public and on the telephone, and are so spontaneous and dramatic that others love to be in their company. Champions are positive, exuberant people, and often their confidence in the goodness of life and of human nature makes good things happen.

Joan Baez, Phil Donahue, Paul Robeson, Bill Moyer, Elizibeth Cady Stanton, Joeseph Campbell, Edith Wharton, Sargent Shriver, Charles Dickens, and Upton Sinclair are examples of Idealist Champions

(Okay, I get it. I am a Champion. :arrow:)


Based on this personality type, according to Jung Career Indicator, the following is a list of my most suitable occupations:

Journalist/Reporter :up:
Fitness & Nutrition
Recreation Specialist
Social Work
Acting and Performances
Film Producer
Public Relations Specialist
Fashion Merchandising

(Okay, that’s it. I am going to quit my job as an engineer. :razz:)

People naturally confide in the Champion (ENFP). That’s why they make such good mediators, counselors, teachers, consultants, and reporters. Any position that outreaches to others can fit the Champion. They can be columnists, journalists, publicists, copy writers, advertising account executives. In the arts they can be character actors, cartoonists, art educators. If they choose jobs such as restaurateur, be sure that their business sites will be unique and designed for a particular type of customer. Don’t be surprised to see them as an inventor. This type of personality wants to experience the whole of life and may change careers more often than many other types. Says Charles, “I’ve had a number of jobs and when there is nothing left to create, I move to something new. I want my life to be spiced with newness, love, and joy.”

(Source: Finding Your Passion or What Makes a Job Right for You?)


P.J. is a Champion (ENFP) Idealist. He never lacks for female companionship. Women seek him out because he’s cheerful and believes in them. His tendency has been to have very intense relationships which burn out quickly. He’s decided that it’s probably best to date casually to avoid flash-in-the-pan romances. P.J. figures he’ll eventually settle down and have a family but, for now, he enjoys the experience of femininity in many different forms. (Ehem… I have nothing to add :lol:)

(Source: Men and Romance Part 3: Idealist Men)

Risk Behaviour

Risk Type Profile- Your Risk Attitude Index 76% – (Primary Type – Inspired (45%), Secondary Type – Adventurer (32%))

Values of the Risk Attitude Index over 85% are typical for people who tend to engage in very risky behavior. Values of the Risk Attitude index below 35% usually mean that the person has increased aspiration for safety and stability.

Primary Type – Inspired (45%)


Your need for the excitement of risk is an inexhaustible source of energy during a greater part of your life. This energy sometimes drives you to endeavors which may endanger your fortune and even your life. You are always obsessed by your idea and persist in advocating and spreading it no matter how it is accepted by society around you. Developing and putting into effect this idea produces in you a pleasurable state of mind and gives you a reason for living. :roll: :roll:

There are a relatively small number of such people in the world, but many of them are universally known because their conviction, faith and determination promulgated ideas that influenced history.

Famous personages who are close to this type include the biblical Abraham :shock:, the apostle Paul, Mohammed :shock:, religious reformers and leaders like Martin Luther :shock:, John Calvin, Joan of Arc, explorers who changed the understanding of global geography like Columbus and Magellan, Galileo, Copernicus, philosopher-utopists like Thomas More, inventors like Fulton, social reformers like Emmeline Pankhurst and Mahatma Ghandi :shock:,  and revolutionists like Robespierre and Lenin. There are also among them founders of various religious sects and of political movements.  (I advocated for The Great Pink Invisible Unicorn before, does that count ha! ha! ha! I shall bestow upon you my faithful ones, multiple orgasms for reading this…)

This type of person may have ideas that are not necessarily earth-shaking or important to all of mankind, but they occupy him completely. These ideas may be of an invention, a scientific hypothesis or a special philosophically substantiated way of life or nutrition, such as Zen Buddhism or vegetarianism. Among this type are also found passionate collectors of paintings, books, stamps, etc., whose main goal is to obtain a rare painting, book or stamp. :???: (This is so not me. Collecting stamp? Collecting 3gp adalah..)

The distinctive characteristic of such persons is their complete preoccupation with their idea; it becomes their purpose in life and they see their lives as the means to implement this idea or as the time period in which they can reach their goals. Their idea extremely important to them and without them they cannot imagine their lives.

Neither past nor present is actual for this type of person; he is pointed only towards the future, the time when his goal will be reached. Obstacles and dangers do not stop him; on the contrary, they stimulate his activity. :roll: :roll:

He treats people around him according to how these people see his ideas and goals: if these people share his goals he will treat them well; if they are indifferent or hostile to his ideas, he will be indifferent or hostile to them; and if they do not approve of them, or worse, are opposed to them, he will regard them as enemies and will hate them.

This type of person, if obsessed by social, political or religious ideas, sees all of mankind as the object of his concern, and he loves mankind as a whole more than individual people. He is ready to sacrifice individual people for the sake of a “common happiness” but not if those individuals are his faithful fellow-fighters. He is also ready to sacrifice himself for his idea. He does not spare either himself or others. :cry: :cry:

Such a person is egocentric in the sense that he considers himself the center of all events – but he is not egotistical. He does not have purely personal interests. Food for him is, for the most part, not a source of pleasure but only the means to satisfy his hunger. He is capable of enjoying his food but often has special tastes: food must be cooked in a special way, or served at a specific temperature, etc. (Okay Mary, this explained your previous comment on my taste bud :lol: )

He does not care for entertainment, except perhaps talking about subjects of interest to him. However, his interests often range beyond the limits of his main idea or obsession and his knowledge in different spheres is striking. He will have his own point of view on all subjects and it is almost always interesting to listen to what he has to say.

He is often surrounded by followers or disciples who are equally passionate about his ideas, but he has only one or two really close friends. He is indifferent to the opposite sex although he can experience a type of love towards one of his admirers, who becomes his main comrade-in-arms.

He is, to some extent, attached to his family, but he is authoritarian towards them and intolerant of the slightest neglect of their duty which is to serve the cause of the head of the family. He suffers major setbacks and even tragedies stoically, turning aside to immerse himself ever deeper in his cause.

Secondary Type – Adventurer (32%)


People of this type are not made for quiet life. Due to their psychological characteristics, the society has always to reckon with their existence either defending itself from them or asking for their help or tolerating them and exploiting secondary results of their activity.

Throughout history, people of this type composed the criminal layers of the society. They were thieves, burglars and gangsters as well as gamblers, card-players, roulette players, etc., who occasionally staked all their property and even their life on luck. :shock: :shock: (This is shocking! But not surprising, hmmmm.. )In ancient Rome, free citizens and even patricians, who felt a great need for risk, voluntarily became gladiators, and if they did not have enough opportunities to fight in the arena, they showed their discontent. This type also included medieval knights wandering in the Europe in search of tournaments, swashbucklers, condottieri and pirates. In more modern times this type can be found among revolutionaries, conspirators, terrorists, and drug smugglers.

These are examples of extremely anti-social manifestations of the needs for risk. But thirst for risk can appear in socially acceptable forms. Mountain-climbers, slalomists, race-drivers, sailors who cross the oceans alone, tightrope-walkers, who walk the rope over waterfalls and precipices, as well as small-time gamblers who play in lotteries and slot machines- all these engage in risky activities which do not harm society.

People with a pronounced thirst for danger and risk may be also useful to society which utilizes their characteristics in employing them in suitable occupations such as the police, the army where they serve as commandos or paratroopers, the fire department and even in the cinema as stuntmen.

People of this type are usually physically strong, courageous, and have excellent control of their bodies. When they are young they eagerly take up, football, baseball, basketball and different types of hand-to-hand combat. They easily master mechanical skills and are good at driving cars. They usually drive at high speed and like to overtake other cars, sometimes creating dangerous situations.

They are not especially bothered by moral problems, but those who are socialized keep to formal moral demands of society, especially to those of a group.  :oops: These people can be subdivided into two groups according to their attitude to the group or to society. One kind gives priority to freedom from all social values and prefers to run risks alone. The other kind likes power and prefers to act in a group. They long for a leading position in the group and although they dislike it, will acknowledge the leadership of any stronger and more authoritative person.

In communicating they are somewhat rough and they can even be cruel to those who are weaker. However, there is an intrinsic sentimentality in them and they can be deeply moved by any soulful story or movie. They like to relax when they are not involved in their dangerous pursuits. Those who are asocial incline to alcohol and drugs. Socialized people of this type relax with peaceful activities such as fishing, gardening, caring for their pets, etc.

As they grow older and have established families, they feel less attracted to risk; memories of their past adventures return to them and they indulge in reminiscences. They begin to feel the future, connecting it with the future of their children. Their love affairs (until they are married) are mostly fleeting and superficial, although sometimes they experience long and stable relationship. They are not fastidious about their food though they prefer meat products.

A vivid example of a person with expressed thirst for risk is Alexander of Macedon who led a dangerous life for what he thought was the goal of spreading of Hellenic civilization throughout the known world. In modern times a similar type was Che Guevara :up: who was fought for his idea of social justice. In literature there was Don Quixote. The international spy, Mata Hari, notorious during the First World War, can be considered to be a woman of this type.

ps: Fun to read. I wonder how much of these personality tests are true. Well, one should never put too much thoughts in it, just do it for fun! TGIF!

pss: Yes, I read it all. Don’t be lazy. Reading is good for you. Ehe!

psss: I love anything that has to do with behavioral analysis. One of my favourite TV series is ‘Criminal Minds.‘ Awesome crime drama! :up:

Tags: , , , , , , ,

You probably want to check out these posts as well:

17 Responses to “I’m a ENFP huh? Nah.. just another personality test.”

  1. foongpc wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 1:10 pm

    What the heck is extravert? I thought it’s extrovert, no?

    Yeah, quit your job and be a reporter lah, since you love reporting about politics. Haha!

    Didn;t know you like tags! I hate them. Anyway, I know who to tag next time. Hehe! 😆


  2. foongpc wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 1:11 pm

    yeah! I’m first commenter! Eh, no reward for FC? My blog now reward FC with a link back. Just to let you know 😆


  3. bongkersz wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 1:47 pm

    Wah? 😛 Link back like how? I go and find out hahaha! I only have reward for Top Commentators, and you definitely one of them kakaka!

    Aiya, not many people visit my blog.. a link back from me.. not as powerful like yours


  4. bongkersz wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 1:48 pm

    I hate tags. Most of the time I ignore them. Ask those who tagged me before haha! But, sometimes I will do if I like the tag, even if I am not tagged. Eheh..


  5. angel_lina wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 3:53 pm



  6. Sandra wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 6:20 pm

    so how is ur relationship with women going? 😛


  7. Sandra wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 9:19 pm

    so how is ur relationship with women going? 😛
    Sorry, forgot to add great post! Can’t wait to see your next post!


  8. saffa wrote on Mar 13, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Ok.. I skip it cuz its TOO LONG! Hahahaha..


  9. alone wrote on Mar 14, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    I give a shot I found myself a playful, but romantic person. uhuh. guess what?


  10. drumsticks wrote on Mar 14, 2009 at 8:40 pm

    LOL… ahhh that explained ur taste bud huh.. was it about not eating duck or something like that? btw, do u think thats accurate? coz i got INFJ.. which .. don’t think accurate coz i’m not an introvert! hehe..


  11. kodokjambul wrote on Mar 15, 2009 at 4:00 am

    hehey! i’m an ENTJ categorize as a fieldmarshal.

    Extraverted – 22%
    Intuitive – 25%
    Thinking – 1% (??? not good w brains is it? but bill gates…???)
    Judging – 44%

    namely in the same league of Bill Gates, Napoleon Bonaparte and Margaret Thatcher and i quote..

    “Hardly more than two percent of the total population, Fieldmarshals are bound to lead others, ”

    hahaha, the call for a bongkak and sombong expression suddenly hits me..

    hey! im gonna quit my job and go into politics, vote for me everyone!

    and drumsticks mann…

    i’d say that the test are true, why? coz i like the sound of it hahahaha cheers bro…

    bongk mann… thanks for d test bro!



  12. David wrote on Mar 15, 2009 at 11:05 am

    If you’re interested in a real psychology-based personality test, check out our Personality Patterns app; it provides very detailed feedback in a visually, interactive format, along w/some cool social features. On the go? Try it on your iPhone.


  13. bongkersz wrote on Mar 16, 2009 at 8:40 am

    haha! i would like to see your bongkak and sombong expression lol!

    thanks for dropping by man!


  14. bongkersz wrote on Mar 16, 2009 at 8:43 am

    are you? 😛 romantic and playful.. is a catch haha!


  15. bongkersz wrote on Mar 16, 2009 at 8:44 am

    About why my comment over food more or less similar, not much excitement I guess. 😳

    Hmm.. I would think you are an introvert eh..


  16. bongkersz wrote on Mar 16, 2009 at 8:46 am

    haha! read it the another day then 😛


  17. bongkersz wrote on Mar 16, 2009 at 8:47 am

    fine.. very fine.. :XO: :XO:


Drop a comment :)

Page 1 of 11