Archive for the ‘Malaysia Today’ Category

MCA is a poppycock party with no balls, what’s your stand on hudud?

Monday, January 5th, 2009 2,154 views

MCA dares DAP on hudud

KUALA TERENGGANU: Tereng­ganu MCA has asked DAP to clearly state whether it opposes plans by its Pakatan Rakyat partner PAS to implement hudud laws should it ever come to power.

State MCA chairman Toh Chin Yaw said the presence of DAP deputy chairman Dr Tan Seng Giaw during the announcement of the PAS candidate for the Kuala Terengganu by-election at Stadium Negeri on Thurs- day reflected the former’s compromise over the implementation of the Islamic law.

Hello? MCA must be too dumb for not reading their own paper, because many times DAP already said it does not support hudud! How many times DAP needs to make its stand? Didn’t DAP left the informal coalition of PAS, KeADILan and DAP in 2002 soon after PAS proposed to have hudud in Terengganu? Do some research before making any stupid statements.

(more…)

Blogosphere, Politicking, Jeykll & Hyde

Tuesday, August 12th, 2008 621 views

I mentioned in my previous post, I am tired, frustrated and lazy to write politics related posts anymore. I am taking a laksa break from it.

Politics in Malaysia has reached its most absurd, ridiculous and pathetic stage. As I reflected upon the recent events, chancing upon Malaysia-Today, The Dandelions and other social-political blogs,  that have been happening in Malaysia, I feel that nature of politics have taken a wrong turn not only in the political arena of both opposition and the ruling parties, but also in the blogosphere.

The blogosphere is now rife with Malaysian conspiracy theories and speculations yet what is the purpose that this knowledge serves? We are not even talking about policies based politics!!! The conspiracies help to increase our frustration, yet it doesn’t help to improve the welfare of the society.

(more…)

Saiful, you can go to hell!

Monday, July 28th, 2008 951 views

If what RPK wrote in his latest article ‘Doctor on the run: police want him to fabricate evidence against Anwar’ is true, then Saiful can be sure his place in hell is confirmed. As your religion says ‘fitnah’ (spreading mischief) is among the seven biggest sins that your God frowns upon and the reward is hell :arrow:

I quote from RPK’s article.

On 21 July 2008, I published an article in this same column called HOW, YET AGAIN, THEY ARE TRYING TO FABRICATE EVIDENCE AGAINST ANWAR. (Read the article here ).

In that article I mentioned as follows:

You see, they asked a certain doctor from a certain hospital to conduct an examination on Saiful. The doctor did so and he came out with a report that said there is no evidence Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised the young man. The police then picked up the doctor and detained him for three days. As much as they tried to force him to change his report to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.

Until today, the doctor stands by his report that there is no evidence Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is going to be made to pay for this but he doesn’t care. He is not going to change his report and say that Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, the police had to release Anwar on personal bond or police bail. The doctor refuses to doctor his report and neither does Anwar want to volunteer his new specimen.

Well, that doctor’s name is Dr Mohamed Osman Abdul Hamid from the Hospital Pusrawi and he has now taken his entire family and has gone into hiding because the police are looking for him and they want him to change his medical report.

At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan went to see Dr Mohamed Osman to complain about a pain he is suffering in his anus. Saiful told the doctor that he had been assaulted by ‘a very important person’ — meaning, of course, sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim.

Dr Mohamed Osman examined Saiful but found no evidence that he had been sodomised, either by Anwar Ibrahim or anyone else for that matter. The doctor’s report (which can be viewed below) says that there is zero (0) skin tearing, zero (0) active bleeding, zero (0) traces of pus, etc., which basically means he can’t be suffering from a pain in the anus as what he alleges.

The doctor’s diagnosis is that he rules out or TRO (to rule out) assault (sodomised). In short: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan is not suffering any pain in the anus and neither was he assaulted or sodomised in the anus.

Saiful then said he would like to make a police report so Dr Mohamed Osman suggested he go for a second medical examination at a government hospital. Saiful did so and the doctor at the government hospital also came out with the same diagnosis. Nevertheless, Saiful still made his police report at the pondok police in the hospital.

In spite of the doctors all confirming that Saiful was never sodomised, the police still pursued the case. Anwar Ibrahim was subsequently arrested by about 20 SWAT members in Balaclavas and armed to the teeth in a dramatic movie-style action-packed drama in front of his house after he had confirmed he would be reporting to the police station at 2.00pm as required.

The police detained Anwar in the lockup until the next morning and even brought him to the hospital for examination and to try to obtain his specimen for what the police say are for purposes of doing a DNA profile. The fact that the police already have Anwar’s DNA profile from 1998, plus the doctors from both hospitals confirm that Saiful was never sodomised, did not seem to matter.

Clearly the government is attempting to fabricate evidence against Anwar and is trying to indict him on trumped-up charges of sodomy. And who but the slime-ball AG and scumbag IGP, the same two players in the 1998 episode, can be behind this latest travesty of justice.

Read more at Malaysia-Today.

Included with the article is the doctor’s report:

Idiots guide to the correct medical procedures to be followed in cases of sodomy

Wednesday, July 23rd, 2008 984 views

Lazy to write, but I would love to share this for read, especially with the DNA-craze in the town, everybody talking like he/she is an expert. The way they talked about DNA, it’s like a holy grail or something.. if the person’s DNA is found at the scene, in the hole, that person is guilty for sure. Bah!

Conviction cannot be based on DNA evidence ALONE if there are a host of other conflicting and non-corroborative evidence. For example, if  a victim  claimed rape in a condominium in KL whilst the accused was addressing a seminar in Singapore at the material time, no amount of DNA recovered at the crime scene  is going to make any difference. :arrow:

Here I shamelessly present to you.. my another copy and paste job.:up:

‘Idiots guide to the correct medical procedures to be followed in cases of alleged sodomy’,

(more…)

Page 1 of 3123»