Archive for July, 2008

Lingamed: A disease running amok!

Wednesday, July 30th, 2008 522 views

From Malaysiakini:

Wednesday, July 30, 2008
A New Lingham in the Making

Excerpts from the question-and-answer session by Malaysiakini’s Andrew Ong & Tarani Palani with Hospital Pusrawi’s general manager Wan Mahmood Wan Yaacob and hospital’s medical director Kamaruddin Ahmad.Kamaruddin:

Q: If you have not been in contact with the doctor, how do you know that the doctor did not conduct a medical check-up for sodomy?

A: We based our decision on the medical report he wrote.

Q: So are there two different reports? Are they (the report that is circulating) the same (as the original)?

A: It is the same report.

Q: You do have the original report, so is it (the copy that is circulating) the genuine report?

A: I cannot say if it is the genuine unless someone confirms, the committee. Maybe, maybe not. It looks the same but it is not the original copy, that is with me.

Looks the same but it is not the same because we have the original copy.

Q: Are the contents the same? It is the original copy from Pusrawi?

A: Yes.

Q: He (Saiful) was not examined for sodomy, but (how come) the doctor said that there was no signs of sodomy.

A: He came complaining of pain in the anus, so that’s a part of the routine, you look for pus, bleeding.

Q: How is this different from an actual sodomy check-up?

A: He came complaining of anus pain not complaining of sodomy. So the doctor performed a check-up for anus pain not sodomy.

Q: What led the doctor TRO (to rule out) sodomy? Why?

A: Because Saiful mentioned that he was sodomised. Sodomy check-up has to be done by a specialist not a medical officer. You need a gut specialist. We don’t have one in Pusrawi.

Q: Does that mean that Dr Mohamed Osman is not qualified to make any conclusions?

A: He is not qualified to make any statements, any conclusions (with regards to sodomy).

Q: You have spoken to Dr Mohamed who has confirmed that he examined Saiful and confirmed that he has signed this medical report, why is the hospital still not convinced that it is the genuine medical report? Why is it taking so long to match the copy with the original copy?

A: We just realised this. When? Two days ago. It is just like VK Lingam said, “It looks like me, sounds like me but it is not me”.

Q: You are not disputing whether the medical report is real. You are disputing if Dr Mohamed has the qualifications to ascertain that (sodomy had occurred). Basically you are discrediting your own medical staff?

A: No, but not when concerning this case. Is he suspended? No, he is on leave.

Q; If the contents of the reports are the same are you acknowledging that the report could have been from Pusrawi?

A: It could have been. It is the same.

Q: There are two different writing on the medical report.

A: Yes, there are two different. The patient arrived to see a doctor, and he meet with a female doctor first. After he complained of his anus pain, than he was passed on to a male doctor (Dr Mohamed).

Somebody, please take a sledge hammer and give those two muthafuckas a good smack in the head? What kind of stupid answers they gave for the interview? I do no farking understand even half of the answers given by those dimwits from Pusrawi Hospital.

(more…)

Saiful, you can go to hell!

Monday, July 28th, 2008 951 views

If what RPK wrote in his latest article ‘Doctor on the run: police want him to fabricate evidence against Anwar’ is true, then Saiful can be sure his place in hell is confirmed. As your religion says ‘fitnah’ (spreading mischief) is among the seven biggest sins that your God frowns upon and the reward is hell :arrow:

I quote from RPK’s article.

On 21 July 2008, I published an article in this same column called HOW, YET AGAIN, THEY ARE TRYING TO FABRICATE EVIDENCE AGAINST ANWAR. (Read the article here ).

In that article I mentioned as follows:

You see, they asked a certain doctor from a certain hospital to conduct an examination on Saiful. The doctor did so and he came out with a report that said there is no evidence Anwar had ever penetrated or sodomised the young man. The police then picked up the doctor and detained him for three days. As much as they tried to force him to change his report to implicate Anwar he refused to do so.

Until today, the doctor stands by his report that there is no evidence Anwar had sodomised Saiful. He knows he is going to be made to pay for this but he doesn’t care. He is not going to change his report and say that Anwar sodomised Saiful whatever they do to him. Exasperated, the police had to release Anwar on personal bond or police bail. The doctor refuses to doctor his report and neither does Anwar want to volunteer his new specimen.

Well, that doctor’s name is Dr Mohamed Osman Abdul Hamid from the Hospital Pusrawi and he has now taken his entire family and has gone into hiding because the police are looking for him and they want him to change his medical report.

At 2.00pm on 28 June 2008, Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan went to see Dr Mohamed Osman to complain about a pain he is suffering in his anus. Saiful told the doctor that he had been assaulted by ‘a very important person’ — meaning, of course, sodomised by Anwar Ibrahim.

Dr Mohamed Osman examined Saiful but found no evidence that he had been sodomised, either by Anwar Ibrahim or anyone else for that matter. The doctor’s report (which can be viewed below) says that there is zero (0) skin tearing, zero (0) active bleeding, zero (0) traces of pus, etc., which basically means he can’t be suffering from a pain in the anus as what he alleges.

The doctor’s diagnosis is that he rules out or TRO (to rule out) assault (sodomised). In short: Mohd Saiful Bukhari Bin Azlan is not suffering any pain in the anus and neither was he assaulted or sodomised in the anus.

Saiful then said he would like to make a police report so Dr Mohamed Osman suggested he go for a second medical examination at a government hospital. Saiful did so and the doctor at the government hospital also came out with the same diagnosis. Nevertheless, Saiful still made his police report at the pondok police in the hospital.

In spite of the doctors all confirming that Saiful was never sodomised, the police still pursued the case. Anwar Ibrahim was subsequently arrested by about 20 SWAT members in Balaclavas and armed to the teeth in a dramatic movie-style action-packed drama in front of his house after he had confirmed he would be reporting to the police station at 2.00pm as required.

The police detained Anwar in the lockup until the next morning and even brought him to the hospital for examination and to try to obtain his specimen for what the police say are for purposes of doing a DNA profile. The fact that the police already have Anwar’s DNA profile from 1998, plus the doctors from both hospitals confirm that Saiful was never sodomised, did not seem to matter.

Clearly the government is attempting to fabricate evidence against Anwar and is trying to indict him on trumped-up charges of sodomy. And who but the slime-ball AG and scumbag IGP, the same two players in the 1998 episode, can be behind this latest travesty of justice.

Read more at Malaysia-Today.

Included with the article is the doctor’s report:

A long and smelly day..

Friday, July 25th, 2008 436 views

“Hey, wake up now. Later we cannot make it on time to the place,” she gentlely nudged his shoulder, trying to wake him up.

“Emmmmhhhhh **%%~@#!!” (lost in translation..) He slowly opened his eyes and lazily mumbled something. “What is the time now?”

“It it 5.45am. Just now woke up you at 5.30am and I went to prepare breakfast, didn’t know you went back to sleep”, shaking her head while she said that to him.

“5.45am? It is still early. Huarraarrrggghh…” (Yawning)

(more…)

A confession of a recovering addict

Thursday, July 24th, 2008 884 views

I have a fickle mind. It is a weakness. Sometimes I can’t be sure what I really want. For instance, I will try many shirts and pants before deciding what I want to wear. When I buy something, I will scrutinize and test everything before I decide, or I may end up not buying. Indecisiveness. I think some who knows me well can testify for that.

I am also the person that when I want something, I want it at that time, if possible. I do not like to wait when I can get it/do it and this is another weakness. I always do things hastily and sometimes I didn’t put much thought and consideration when doing it. Spur of the moment thing. Yeah, carpe diem heh? Seize the moment by the balls. For some people it is spontaneous and fun, but after much self evaluations and reflections, there are many things that I regretted doing. If I could turn back time, yes I would change all that. I never talk much about things that I regretted doing, only to people I really close with. Perhaps it is time to share some stories.

(more…)

Page 1 of 912345»...Last »